This directory is not a polemic. It is a systematic audit. Each article begins with the claim as stated by LCDM proponents, presents the observational evidence for and against that claim from the peer-reviewed literature, and reaches a conclusion based on what the evidence supports.
Where the evidence is ambiguous, that ambiguity is stated. Where the evidence contradicts the claim, that contradiction is documented with citations. The Big Flare-Up Theory is presented as an alternative where one exists — but the critique of each claim stands independently of whether BFUT is correct.
Directory
The standard response to "where was the singularity" generates an immediate logical contradiction. Follow the argument.
Read Critique →The 2019 peer-reviewed reanalysis of the Nobel-winning dataset found 3.9-sigma directional anisotropy. This finding has not been refuted.
Read Critique →Decades of null results from every major detection experiment. Alternative explanations for flat rotation curves exist and are demonstrable.
Read Critique →Three independent measurements of H₀ return three different values. The tension has exceeded 6 sigma.
Read Critique →An alternative derivation of 2.725 K using only the Stefan-Boltzmann relation and measured luminosity density. Zero free parameters.
Read Critique →It explains three of four. For lithium-7, the prediction is off by a factor of 3.5. This has been unresolved for 30 years.
Read Critique →JWST has confirmed spectroscopically verified galaxies at z = 10 to 13.2 that are more massive and structured than LCDM formation timescales permit.
Read Critique →Three specific predictions of the balloon analogy that are directly contradicted by observation. Galaxy sizes. Orientations. The undefined local exception.
Read Critique →Download All Research Papers & Simulation Code
The complete BFUT research programme is published open access on Zenodo. 15 papers plus 8 simulation code deposits. All free. All permanently archived with citable DOIs.