Jargon can clarify.
It can also conceal.
Cosmology often benefits from the second use. Complex phrases can make weak assumptions feel untouchable simply because many readers do not stop to unpack them. “Expansion of space,” “relic radiation,” “inflationary epoch,” “comoving coordinates,” “cosmic age”, all of these may have valid technical roles, but they can also create a haze in which the underlying conceptual strain is less visible.
BFUT cuts through that haze.
It keeps translating jargon back into questions ordinary intelligent readers can test. Does the balloon really help, or does it hide contradictions? Is the Hubble constant really constant? Is the age of the universe really stable? Is first light the same as first existence? Does the observable universe equal all reality? Does a boundary of all space even make coherent sense?
This is why BFUT can be dangerous in public discourse.
It makes it harder for prestige language to do the work of persuasion by itself.
That is not anti-technical.
It is anti-obscurantist.
And it is a major reason the theory can travel beyond narrow specialist culture without becoming unserious.
Download the research paper: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19149786 (doi.org in Bing) Download the simulation code: https://zenodo.org/records/19124510 Watch the simulation work: https://vijayshankarsharma.com/